Are modern ML PhDs becoming too incremental, or is this just what research looks like now? [D]
The text explores whether modern ML PhDs are becoming overly incremental, often involving combining existing ideas and applying them in slightly different settings with benchmark results. The author questions if this truly constitutes a deeper scientific contribution, feeling many theses resemble extended master's degrees.
![Continual Harness: Online Adaptation for Self-Improving Foundation Agents [R]](/cdn-cgi/image/width=3840,quality=75,format=webp/https://preview.redd.it/p9cd2zmfy01h1.png?width=140&height=56&auto=webp&s=fd1f3545b0efc0e42e9d014caa1aa2f83f0f409a)
![How Visual-Language-Action (VLA) Models Work [D]](/cdn-cgi/image/width=3840,quality=75,format=webp/https://external-preview.redd.it/fBpt1C8zS6YDW2Lp0_fnNCU2C0Dw1W3tzt7P4g39SHw.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=d9f046e9b38c478cf671d18df1b23a42fd1613bd)

!["I don't know!": Teaching neural networks to abstain with the HALO-Loss. [R]](/cdn-cgi/image/width=3840,quality=75,format=webp/https://preview.redd.it/loxsfywek4vg1.png?width=140&height=123&auto=webp&s=e494bc934351aeddad8b50b76059d35dc7987a4f)

